(no subject)
May. 20th, 2008 10:44 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Note to self: Do not read the BBC forums on abortion. Rage is bad for thesis. *fumes*
In view of all the people saying that women should not abort unless they've been raped - that the choice to have sex implies the possibility of pregnancy, and therefore women who choose to have sex should be prepared to have babies - I would like to present a modest proposal suggested by my friend B. today.
Men who oppose abortions? Shouldn't be having (heterosexual) sex.
ETA: Abortion limit remains at 24 weeks. I may have done a fistpump of joy.
In view of all the people saying that women should not abort unless they've been raped - that the choice to have sex implies the possibility of pregnancy, and therefore women who choose to have sex should be prepared to have babies - I would like to present a modest proposal suggested by my friend B. today.
Men who oppose abortions? Shouldn't be having (heterosexual) sex.
ETA: Abortion limit remains at 24 weeks. I may have done a fistpump of joy.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 10:38 pm (UTC)Yes. And don't get me started on how single mothers are treated as sluts who selfishly have children just to be a burden on society. And how pregnancy is just a problem for women, and their fault for not bothering with contraception - not that men are involved in any way.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 11:04 pm (UTC)Years ago I read an op-ed by a man complaining that IVF would allow women to have children without having the responsibility of a husband. I doubt he had any idea how telling his comments really were.