wildestranger (
wildestranger) wrote2008-05-29 12:55 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
Newly married Ashlee Simpson is changing her name to Ashlee Wentz in honor of her husband, Fall Out Boy Pete Wentz.
"I think that that's something that a woman should do when they're marrying a man," she tells PEOPLE. "It's a tradition that I think is a great tradition."
Seriously? A great tradition? You mean the tradition which declares that a woman who has been her father's property now becomes her husbands' property, that tradition? The one that says a woman's identity should depend on her husband?
I just lost what little respect I had for Ashlee Simpson. And the fact that Pete Wentz seems to think it's a great idea, something that gratifies him, makes me think a lot less of him as well.
"I think that that's something that a woman should do when they're marrying a man," she tells PEOPLE. "It's a tradition that I think is a great tradition."
Seriously? A great tradition? You mean the tradition which declares that a woman who has been her father's property now becomes her husbands' property, that tradition? The one that says a woman's identity should depend on her husband?
I just lost what little respect I had for Ashlee Simpson. And the fact that Pete Wentz seems to think it's a great idea, something that gratifies him, makes me think a lot less of him as well.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
The percentage of women marrying who take their husband's name has gone up over the last twenty years, but I think it's because the women who would previously have kept their name simply aren't marrying their partners anymore.
Catherine Deveney, a columnist and professional ranter, wrote a column/rant on how stupid/patricarchal/out-dated/sexist it is that women take their husbands' names. The backlash she got was extraordinary. Men calling talk back and saying "I told my wife she didn't have to take my name when we married" which just proved her point.
no subject
no subject
(I could be really mean and point out that you've tagged your "feminist rant" about Ashlee is under her husband's full name, not hers at all, but I'm far too agreeable for that. Oops. ;p)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Words - names - are very powerful. I just could never see giving up my identity like that. A lot of women I respect think differently, as is their right, but that's how I see it.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
But to be relevant to this post, I think most of my feelings have already been articulated in earlier comments, but let me ask you this for the sake of playing Devil's advocate: Would it be more palatable for Ashlee to partake in this 'tradition' if it were done more for the added sense of commitment to her new husband rather than consciously perpetuating the ideals of ownership? Don't get me wrong, I'm inherently against the concept of monogamy myself (and marriage to a lesser extent), but I'm all for ridiculous all-encompassing love, which - I think - is what these two are all about. I doubt she meant the tradition to be viewed in such a Draconian context, rather an extension of her declaration of love.
Or, not, I dunno, that's just my view of it.
no subject
I really like the Hispanic? Spanish? (I'm not quite sure where it all applies) tradition where men and women keep their names after they've married and their children's family name is a combination of their family names (they usually have double names and so you take the first part of the father's family name and the first part of the mother's family name and tadah! New family name for the baby.)
no subject
I also love it when women refer to themselves as "Mr. Peter Wentz" etc.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
wtf?!
::weeps::