(no subject)

[wildestranger]

Clarification by lj

So apparently it's not that it's child pornography, which they admit, but that it doesn't have artistic merit, which they decide.

Comments

[ter369.livejournal.com]

Thanks for the link to that comment. (Too much to follow and read today.)

My Greatest Journal Flist has picked up action again.

[madeline871.livejournal.com]

Lacking artistic merit? How exactly do they determine that?

[daisy-chan.livejournal.com]

I'm sure ponderosa and elaboration are ever so pleased that their merit as artists was decided by three LJ code monkeys for five minutes in the break room, while they were waiting for their coffee to brew.

[ellie-nor.livejournal.com]

Oh my giddy aunt. Never mind that IMO you'd have to have something seriously wrong with your eyesight to think that Harry was underage in that Snape/Harry fanart in the first place. Roll on Scribblit.