(no subject)
May. 20th, 2008 10:44 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Note to self: Do not read the BBC forums on abortion. Rage is bad for thesis. *fumes*
In view of all the people saying that women should not abort unless they've been raped - that the choice to have sex implies the possibility of pregnancy, and therefore women who choose to have sex should be prepared to have babies - I would like to present a modest proposal suggested by my friend B. today.
Men who oppose abortions? Shouldn't be having (heterosexual) sex.
ETA: Abortion limit remains at 24 weeks. I may have done a fistpump of joy.
In view of all the people saying that women should not abort unless they've been raped - that the choice to have sex implies the possibility of pregnancy, and therefore women who choose to have sex should be prepared to have babies - I would like to present a modest proposal suggested by my friend B. today.
Men who oppose abortions? Shouldn't be having (heterosexual) sex.
ETA: Abortion limit remains at 24 weeks. I may have done a fistpump of joy.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 07:34 am (UTC)mostly, i just feel like people miss the point in this discussion. pro-choice just means leaving the decisions about what happens to the women's bodies to the women themselves. i've never understood taking on the authority to direct someone else's choices. i love the "modest proposal," especially because, just, how dare someone who will never have to make this choice try to tell women what to do?
thank you for being articulate about this. it was a relief to read. (no, i haven't heard a lot of stupid comments about this issue recently, not at all.)